Quoting mommyof2angels: I think he should be responsible. Obviously, if they are saving the sperm, they aparently wanted to have a baby? So if he consented to it, then he should, yes.The thing is he didnt consent. She was saving the sperm that came out of her without his knowledge and then putting it in her vagina (ugg, gross.) Its like she was trying to trap him or something.
Quoting angel mommy: Can you do that!!! No clue! Someone made a post about it though. I kind of think its a little unbelievable.
Quoting Sammie Jay©: The thing is he didnt consent. She was saving the sperm that came out of her without his knowledge and then putting it in her vagina (ugg, gross.) Its like she was trying to trap him or something.
Quoting J&LsMommy: If he can prove that's how they got pregnant then no I don't think he should be responsible but if they ... [snip!] ... are they were having vaginal sex also. There would really be no way to prove that that time was when the pregnancy occured.Apparently the story is that they werent having vaginal sex because the guy didnt want to get her pregnant.
Quoting LOVES MONKEYS: how did she gfet it out of her bummm..........never mind i dont want to know.Thats what I was kinda thinking!!!
Quoting Sammie Jay©: No clue! Someone made a post about it though. I kind of think its a little unbelievable.I am so confused, if they had vaginal sex also then it is his responsibility, but if it was just anal, then no, she might as well have went to a sperm bank.
Quoting LOVES MONKEYS: umm your not suppose to mix the back with the front cause you can ger an infection right...so if she ... [snip!] ... had to pretty desperate for a baby, i think he could sue her for that...ok maybe not, maybe i just watch to much law and orderbut how would you prove that??
About | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise
All contents copyright © baby-gaga.com 2003-2006. All Rights Reserved.