I have no opinion on people who have or have not had their son circumcisied. (My son is because me and his father chose to have him circumcisied). I just want to see a real percentage for once instead of reading online that less then ten percent of newborn boys are not cut when they are born, because honestly I think more people are choosing not to then 10 percent. So again just curious. Thanks for voting.

I've got some of each.

you need an option for
I have both

I've heard nowadays there are somewhere around 60% baby boys not getting cut.

Quoting Elizabeth Gough:" I have no opinion on people who have or have not had their son circumcisied. (My son is because me and ... [snip!] ... are born, because honestly I think more people are choosing not to then 10 percent. So again just curious. Thanks for voting."

I voted for the first one, because if we had a son, that decision would be left to his father, and he would want it that way.

Damn I clicked the wrong vote... My son is not.

My first son is, and my next son will be as well.

Dang I did not think about that. Can I change it? Ill check.

The statistics are flawed anyway. They only count circumcisions done in the hospital at time of birth, not ones done in the couple weeks following in an outpatient setting.

If I have a son, he will not be

My son is, but I'd push a little harder next time if we had another for it not happen.

Both my boys. And my dad told me I should because he is not and he has problems now and I didn't want my kids like that.

I voted is NOT, he isn't born yet, but won't be circ'd. DH isn't and doesn't want his son to be either.

DH and DS is not, and if my little on is a boy, he will not be cut either.
DH wanted DS to be circ'd, but I didnt. and because it was an elective procedure, it wasnt covered by insurance.

My oldest wasnt until 7 months ago. But since he was having medical problems, he had to get circ'd. If I have more sons they will NOT be circ'd.