Forums > Debate & Discussby: Man. Bear. Sloth.

News broadcasts and coverage

posted 19th Feb
Wrote this, this morning. What do you think? Do you think sometimes the info is just too much? Do you think there should be more coverage and more details?

http://elliebean78.blogspot.com/2013/02/breaking-news.html
quote
I have 2 kids & 2 angel babies & live in Arizona
posted 19th Feb
Agree to everything you said. The last sentence is what sums it up. Its all about ratings, its all about entertainment and gossip. I don't watch the news, I refuse to. What pissed me off more than anything is for example when the Sandy Hook shooting happened. They were so quick to jump on it and all the news companies wanted to have the "latest" in details that half the smurf they posted into late afternoon was wrong. Why not get the facts straight before putting out BS news? Why not just say there's been a school shooting and keep it at that? But it was weeks worth of the same thing, I mean I'm from CT so it hit close to home sure but idk. They definitely need to stop with all the negative crap.
quotesmurfs?
I have 2 kids & 1 angel baby & live in Connecticut
posted 19th Feb
I definitely agree that children need to be monitored, even with the news. As far as reporting, I think they need to hold off until they get correct information (case in point-- Sandy Hook, news blasting that the wrong person did it for hours).

And I don't think they should put in as much detail. It's one thing to be reporting on it, it's another to let everyone in the world know the nitty-gritty, before there's even a trial. I think it screws with the justice system, too.

As far as addresses: they should not be posting that anywhere, or showing photos on the news. I think that crosses a line: especially when it's somewhere that people could go to see, and further idolize (even negatively) the person who committed the crime, and torment the victims.
quote
I'm due September 11th (a boy), have 1 child & live in Syracuse, New York
posted 19th Feb
I see what you're saying but for me news changed on 9/11.

I think that is where I got to the point that I wanted to know "whats happening now".

I agree that printing and releasing information that cannot be confirmed is completely irresponsible and simply a means for news providers to get more people to get their news from one particular source.

Sandy Hook was about the same. Being in CT and waiting to hear what really happened, who was involved, etc had me tuned to the news the entire day while I was at work.

Idk where it ends, mass communications are our savior and will more than likely be our downfall as well.
quote
I have 2 kids & live in Ireland
post reply

who's online

There are 702 people online304 members & 398 guestssee all 304 members
 
alllatest topics
crystalgayle2011 postedmy weight so far2 min ago
Baby_Majick postedMylanta for babies?!10 min ago
2Girls & Blessed postedChoosing Medical Providers??11 min ago
Kelly&Coralie postedWhat to watch on Netflix12 min ago
Regina George ♡ postedFucking GROSSSSSS13 min ago
RegisterLoginSearchMembers MapWhos OnlineAdvanced Search
Pregnancy Weeks 1 - 40 Due Date Calculator Top 40 Books Cartoons Pregnancy Models Sarcastic Journalist Forums Resources & Links Pregnancy Issues Due Date Buddies Teen Pregnancy Baby Names TTC & Adoption Suffering & Loss Abortion Survivors Preparing for Baby Labor & Birth Tickers Pregnancy Tickers
Parenting Months 0 - 12 Baby Models Forums Resources & Links Post Partum Issues Parents with Preemies Parents with Infants Parents with Toddlers Parents with Kids Single Parenting Teen Parenting Special Needs Tickers Birthday Tickers
Forums Free for All Photo Spot Debate & Discuss Health & Well-Being Sex & Relationships All Things Food Contests Creation Station Weight Loss & Fitness Shopping & Classifieds Faqs & Feedback The Drama Corner

About | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise

All contents copyright © baby-gaga.com 2003-2011. All Rights Reserved.