Quoting Vile Tramp:" I read 15% with proper treatment. But it could have been outdated."Yeah, I mean honestly it depends on the source. But I was surprised about the ladies who though an HIV infected woman would indefinitely have an HIV infected baby.
Quoting RonniG:" Yeah, I mean honestly it depends on the source. But I was surprised about the ladies who though an HIV infected woman would indefinitely have an HIV infected baby."
Quoting RonniG:" Yeah, I mean honestly it depends on the source. But I was surprised about the ladies who though an HIV infected woman would indefinitely have an HIV infected baby."
Quoting *boobie babies mom* +1:" if i had it however i would not be BF just to risky imho ...but WHO says it is safe.."
Quoting *~AngelEyes~*:" I wouldn't say it is."the studies out there now are saying it is ...it has to do with the meds...i learned about it on here..the safety portion of it..the pathology i already knew about lol
Quoting *boobie babies mom* +1:" the studies out there now are saying it is ...it has to do with the meds...i learned about it on here..the safety portion of it..the pathology i already knew about lol"Yeah that is true.
Quoting RonniG:" I have no idea where you got this statistic. An HIV-positive mother who is not being treated for her ... [snip!] ... HIV to her baby. I have read a few books about this. But from this thread, I am surprised how misinformed people are. "
About | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise
All contents copyright © baby-gaga.com 2003-2011. All Rights Reserved.