as the topic states...simple yes or no  

Okay...












Your avi is hilarious!



That's all.

No.
Banning them won't stop people from owning them.

I support it.

That said, if they really wanted to regulate weapons, they would regulate ammo. There are too many weapons out and about for the government to collect them all

This is kinda how I look at it...

Yes and no. I really don't think civilians need assault riffles but I don't agree with limiting how much ammo a person can have

Quoting ★Date311161.69:" Okay... Your avi is hilarious! That's all."

 

Quoting Chuck Bass:" This is kinda how I look at it... "

I just posted this on my Facebook today.

<blockquote><b>Quoting Chuck Bass:</b>" This is kinda how I look at it... "</blockquote>




Lmao!




My answer. No.

If the government has them, we should be able to. Period.

No.

Since when did making something illegal ever help the problem? If anything, it'll make things worse. Humans are notorious for doing what they are told not to do.

Quoting Chuck Bass:" This is kinda how I look at it... "

    

I own an AR 22.
My husband and I are responsible gun owners. I have been through firearm safety classes. I'm looking into getting my CCW.

Good people own guns, too. Not just psychos.

I would like to point out that I own a simple self-defense handgun, Glock 9mm with 10+1 capacity, which is now illegal in New York. I'm fuzzy on the details about whether or not my +1 will make the gun illegal everywhere since that bullet isn't actually in the magazine.

NO. It's ridiculously stupid and wrong in so many ways.