Quoting Mz.Behavin:" <blockquote><b>Quoting Nathaniel'sMom:</b>" First child is always entitled to more ... [snip!] ... the other child was born first does not make them more important or entitled to more money than a child who was born later."
What I'm saying is... if a man has a child born and is paying 400 a bucks in child support, the court will take that into account and the other children he has will not get as much money because he cant make the same amount of money to pay 400 for the next child and still live. And they wont reduce child support of the first child just because a new child came along... its not fair but thats why guys need to wrap their smurf and both the girl and guy need to be cognizant of who they sleep with.
Im not saying it SHOULD be that way....
But I also feel that if a mother or father doesnt want a child they should be able to sign over their rights and not have to pay child support. If a girl decides to have a child and the father doesnt want it, he should not be forced to pay child support. I think its a bunch of bullsmurf that it happens a lot of the time. Most of the time, actually. Girls go for child support despite the guy CLEARLY not wanting to be there.