You're in a building that catches fire, you can only save ONE thing. Your two options are:

A.) a homeless man.
B.) a case of money.

Which do you choose to save? You CANNOT say both, because i'm sure most people would try to save both if possible.

Why did you choose what you did?

(i got this from the mentalist, if you've seen it...)

The homeless man!

The homeless guy.

The man, not sure why homeless is a factor, does that mean he's worth less than a man with a home?

Neither. I'd just be concerned with getting my ass out of there.

Money can be replaced, a life cannot be replaced.

Quoting Dalek:" Neither. I'd just be concerned with getting my ass out of there."

Lmao!!

Quoting Dalek:" Neither. I'd just be concerned with getting my ass out of there."

Probably this.

The man, I could not live with that on my conscience.

Quoting Legendary Amanda:" The man, not sure why homeless is a factor, does that mean he's worth less than a man with a home?"

I dunno. That was just the question on the show.

A life of course you can always make new money. A life is unque and cant get replaced.

Assuming that if I don't save this man, he's gonna die. Then, the homeless man. No amount of money could make me save money over a life. I would probably save a dog over a case of money. I have too much of a conscience to just let someone die over $

Honestly i dont know i would risk my kids not having a mum trying to save either i doubt i would have the strength to lift a man and carry him out a burning building... i guess i cant answer that question tho never have been being in that situation

The man, but I'd be pretty pissed about it if say, I somehow ended up poor & he just kept on homeless and whatever anyway, to be honest.

Absolutely save the man!

His is a life. The case was only money, and people are by far, by FAR more valuable than money.