Quoting Rd.:" This is stemming from an older debate I had, but I'm wondering about it lol Short version: In respect ... [snip!] ... are Adam and Eve human or animal? And if you believe in God, do you think that through creationism, he created evolution? lol"
Quoting Leisurely Duchess:" There is absolutely no good reason to drive a wedge between evolution and religion. It's counterproductive, ... [snip!] ... different story though lol. You will be hard-pressed to find a theistic evolutionist that believes in a literal Adam and Eve."
Quoting martinez♥:" In the bible it clearly says that Adam was man and Eve was woman, so I think that kinda means they were ... [snip!] ... argue that evolution was created by Satan as an attempt to disprove the creationalism theory and turn people from God's word."
Quoting Leisurely Duchess:" LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO"I am so glad to see you back. I missed you.
Quoting MysticWitchKat:" I think it's a bit silly in 2012 for people to believe a story such as that."
Quoting Lucid Dreamer:" I am so glad to see you back. I missed you."
Quoting Devil Duckie:" the argument stops at Adam and Ever had sons and no daughters. Where the hell did everyone else come from? "
Quoting Leisurely Duchess:" I sometimes hang out with theistic evolutionists on FB. They also argue against various kinds of creationism ... [snip!] ... lol, a literal reading of everything in the Bible. But alas, even the so-called literalists cherry pick in their own way..."Oh I know this, believe me they also will be the ones stretching every bit of data possible to prove the exodus as well. Sort of like david rohl, who wants to shift Egyptian history 300 years so it can prove biblical stories more effectively.
Quoting Leisurely Duchess:" The Bible mentions a city that already existed, from which Cain went and got a wife from after he was marked."
Quoting MysticWitchKat:" Oh I know this, believe me they also will be the ones stretching every bit of data possible to prove ... [snip!] ... well. Sort of like david rohl, who wants to shift Egyptian history 300 years so it can prove biblical stories more effectively."
Quoting Devil Duckie:" *face palm* I'm not even going to start. the damn thing is so full of inconsistencies and historical ... [snip!] ... crimes against women and children.... My poor intelligent brain will smurfing explode if I try to tear that sucker apart. "Try asking a bible thumper about the 2 sets of 10 commandments ;)
Quoting Devil Duckie:" *face palm* I'm not even going to start. the damn thing is so full of inconsistencies and historical ... [snip!] ... crimes against women and children.... My poor intelligent brain will smurfing explode if I try to tear that sucker apart. "
Quoting MysticWitchKat:" Try asking a bible thumper about the 2 sets of 10 commandments ;)"
Quoting Leisurely Duchess:" You kind of have to be ridiculous to take that story literally. Even 1000 years ago the hugely influential ... [snip!] ... influential Rabbi Rashi argued against a literal reading of Genesis. To be literal about it today is just a step backwards."
About | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise
All contents copyright © baby-gaga.com 2003-2011. All Rights Reserved.