Pictures of children in their underwear

Do you think someone should post pictures of your child (not a baby, but over the age of 3) in their underwear on facebook? Is it inappropriate? Would you or do you do it?

Meh, personally no, not that old i wouldn't. But if someone else does, thats their choice. I kinda view it as child porn but thats JMO.

Hm, there's pictures of little man on my FB running around in his shirt and diaper...

but I have everything set to where no one can find me and only my friends and family can see.

Ok- above the age of three.. I wouldn't.

I really don't see it as that big of a deal although I wouldnt post one up of my daughter

No big deal to me. It's hot where we live most of the year, so my kids are in swim gear, underwear, whatever.

I'd be a little mad if someone else posted pictures of my kids in their underwear but I wouldn't post any of my kids after about 5.

<blockquote><b>Quoting Chelsea Dawns Mama:</b>" Meh, personally no, not that old i wouldn't. But if someone else does, thats their choice. I kinda view it as child porn but thats JMO."</blockquote>


I feel similar. I would never and have had to ask my family to take pictures down of my DD in her panties (she was 3 1/2) playing in the water. She didn't have a suit she forgot it and I didn't mind her playing in the backyard in just her panties, I just didn't want the public to see it. But I am a little paranoid, I see anyone I don't personally know as a potential threat or predator to my kids.

Of their child? It's their choice.. depends what's going on in the picture I guess.. of MY child, again.. depends if I know about it, why they took the picture etc..
I posted a couple pictures of myself when I was.. 3-5ish shirtless and in shorts. It was summer and I rarely wore shirts until I was 6.
So I guess I have a different view on it..? -shrug-

Quoting Mama Rice:" <blockquote><b>Quoting Chelsea Dawns Mama:</b>" Meh, personally no, not that old i ... [snip!] ... to see it. But I am a little paranoid, I see anyone I don't personally know as a potential threat or predator to my kids."

If her top half was covered, it'd be different, but JUST panties? No, thats too much skin on a little kid to be online. Too many pervs out there.

No big deal to me. Someone else posting pics of my daughter pisses me off though. What's the difference between swimming suits and underwear?

Quoting Dr. Paradigm Shift:" No big deal to me. It's hot where we live most of the year, so my kids are in swim gear, underwear, whatever."

   

<blockquote><b>Quoting HopingforaMiracle:</b>" No big deal to me. Someone else posting pics of my daughter pisses me off though. What's the difference between swimming suits and underwear?"</blockquote>




Right. I guess if posting pics of my kids in the pool or at the beach is "child porn"...come on.

Quoting HopingforaMiracle:" No big deal to me. Someone else posting pics of my daughter pisses me off though. What's the difference between swimming suits and underwear?"

On girls, their top half isn't exposed. For boys, if its tighty whities, more of a chance to see their pee pees.

<blockquote><b>Quoting HopingforaMiracle:</b>" No big deal to me. Someone else posting pics of my daughter pisses me off though. What's the difference between swimming suits and underwear?"</blockquote>


My DD is only allowed to wear one pieces and my DS has gotten a shirt that matches his trunks every swimsuit he has had. They cover a lot more than panties or underwear.