<blockquote><b>Quoting Batavus:</b>" well, it was done on 23.07.2012."</blockquote>




Ohh that makes sense then.. I thought you had recently gotten the scan done. So you had planned on the baby being a surprise?
My boy was very obvious in the scan.. We had the gender one done at 16 weeks exactly. This time I'm almost positive the baby is a girl according to Ramzis theory and my thirteen week scan the nub was very short and aligned with the spine. Dd you notice anything during yours?

Quoting GL♣:" <blockquote><b>Quoting Batavus:</b>" well, it was done on 23.07.2012."</blockquote> ... [snip!] ... Ramzis theory and my thirteen week scan the nub was very short and aligned with the spine. Dd you notice anything during yours?"

This is my first... i am open to any gender but scans are pretty confusing for me. If i go by placenta theory, and if it is applicable to 10.5w scans then it is clearly on the right side of my uterus which means a baby boy. If i go by 20w anatomy scan, then i can clearly see three lines, which means a baby girl. I do not believe in old wives tale, so waiting till december. we have got only neutral color...
wishing you all luck with your pregnancy and you get what you want.

I see a rather clear "hamburger" Congrats on your baby girl! :-)

Quoting sueforizzle:" I see a rather clear "hamburger" Congrats on your baby girl! :-)"

Thanks for your reading of the scan. A friend of mine says since the lines are not parallel to the spine, she would not conclude it for a baby girl. I wish you are right.