sratrat wrote: I would much rather have a vaginal birth. It seems terrible but once its over its not that bad. Even if you tear or are cut the healing process probably isn't as bad. Don't you get scars from having a c-section? i wouldn't want that either.
1hotmamma wrote: Just wanted to mention that yes, you have a scar but it lightens up a lot, mine is hardly visible! And yeah, my stomach isn't perfect anymore, but do I care? Nope.
I am married, I have a gorgious child...am I going to model bikinis? Nope. I honestly do not care that my stomach isn't flat anymore
Plurpixie wrote: For me the vaginal recovery was way worse than the c-section.
I had a massive episiotomy that eventually tore and got infected, it never healed properly and I will have to undergo vaginal surgery to repair what it did. Sex is painful for me now, and it will sometimes rip. No fun at all. My c-section healed just fine and I was walking around with no worries after the first 24 hours. The scar is minimal compared to what the vaginal birth did. Also, with my vaginal birth my son had what is called a shoulder dystocia, he got stuck and almost had to have his collar bone broke. Luckily it wasnt that severe, and only ended in a massive episiotomy.
Mara wrote: i'm just curious-- why would someone elect to have a c-section if it's not necessary?
is it fear or pain? or tearing?
About | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Advertise
All contents copyright © baby-gaga.com 2003-2006. All Rights Reserved.